Interfaith Oceans
Bridging Faith & Science,
Restoring Oceans & Their Communities
  • About Us
    • 7 Ocean Vices
    • Our Staff
    • Our Advisers
    • Our Partner Organizations
    • History
    • Religious Principles
  • Issues
  • Awareness Resources
    • Do Your Part >
      • ACTION CAMPAIGNS
      • Youth Activities
    • YouTube films, Movies
    • Books
    • Organizations
    • Speakers
    • Conferences
    • Humor
    • World Oceans Faith-Based Posters
    • Initiatives
  • Blog
  • Ethics Statements
    • Pope Francis & Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew
    • Pope Francis >
      • Pontifical Council of Justice and Peace
    • Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew
    • Archbishop Desmund Tutu
    • Reverend Lusama from Tuvalu Island Nation
    • Carl Safina's Plea for an Ocean Ethic
    • Turkish Ethic of the Seas
  • Contact Us
  • Rev. Margaret

Turkish Ethic of the Sea

"For the Health of the Sea: In Search of an Expansive 'Land Ethic' in Turkish Maritime Literature" by Dr. Ufuk Özdağ

This article by Dr. Ufuk Özdağ compares the death of a swordfish in the novel Deniz Ağacı [The Tree of the Sea (Sea-Fan)] (1962), written by the preeminent novelist of Turkish sea literature, Yaman Koray (1943–2006) to that of the death of the wolf in the essay "Thinking Like a Mountain" by the American conservationist and land ethicist Aldo Leopold. Dr. Ozdag -- who is a professor at Hacettepe University in Ankara, Turkey -- goes further to integrate the religious and spiritual nature of an ocean ethic, and how much Turkey needs such an ethic:

            In any case, such an integral approach to conservation exists in an ancient and forgotten Turkish creation                     myth that concerns a category of the spirit that dissolves the terrestrial/marine distinction: the “Yer-Su” (land– 
            water) spirits that Kara Han created—an entity that is one. “Yer-Su” spirits are associated with nature spirits                 connected to Ötüken, the Mother Earth.

             At times, “Yer-Su” spirits could be the spirit of trees, rocks, mountains, lakes, rivers, or even of the entire                 country; it is imperative that communities pay due respect to the entire earth [not just the terrestrial or the                 marine], for “nature's bounty will diminish if certain rules are not observed,” indicative of the punishment for                 being disrespectful (Miskiniene 136). Echoing the ancient “Yer-Su” ethics, the model of an expansive land ethic             comprising the terrestrial, the aquatic, and marine environments could be redemptive for numerous coastal                 communities around the globe, and certainly, for peoples living in a country like Turkey, surrounded by seas o             on all three sides, and harboring an inland sea.

She then proceeds to quote more contemporary sources, decrying the plummeting fish populations in the Marmara Sea and Istanbul Strait.  She suggests questions that might prompt the development of an ethic of the seas:

            Can Marmara residents expand their vision to include marine life in their sense of community?

            Such a community concept would urge responsible behavior toward the sea and its creatures. Are the natives             aware that they are connected to the sea around them through the seafood they eat and the other marine                     resources they use? As Leopold noted, to not be aware of this linkage poses a “spiritual danger.” Do the                     Marmara people know how the marine environment has changed within their lifetime? Do they know what                     events led to loss of marine biodiversity? Do they know that the sea around them is what it is because of their             past decisions? If they did, would they now be willing to make pro-marine life choices?

            Knowing the impact of our past decisions is a first step toward a sustainable marine ecosystem. Are they aware             that human health is connected to sea health, and that the health of the seas, and in turn human health, is                 determined by our values? Such awareness would be a key factor in developing an expanded land ethic to                     include the seas. Do they know that for replenishing diminished sea-life, collective action of coastal                             communities is necessary? Such collective action would reconnect us to the sea creatures. Do they know that a             land ethic that embraces the sea can never really be written, that it must evolve over time “in the minds of a                 thinking community” (Leopold, Almanac 263)?

            This profound knowledge will help the emergence of an expanded land ethic that will also reflect our own                     cultural values about the sea. Do they understand that their unique marine ecosystem evolved over vast                     expanse of geological time? Are they ready to read the seascapes from the perspective of the sea? Finally, do             they know the need to Think Like the Marmara Sea?"

After further exploring current literature and science, Dr.
Özdağ concludes:

"All this said, let me slightly modify Leopold's prophetic words in his essay, “The River of the Mother of God,” to speak for the spiritual and physical welfare of future generations. I believe it is time to 'draw a line around' each special marine environment, and declare: This is marine wilderness, and marine wilderness it shall remain. "

For the full article, see: http://isle.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/1/5.full

The article was first published in ISLE: Interdisciplinary Study of Literature and the Environment (Winter 2013) 20 (1): 5-30 first published online February 20, 2013 doi:10.1093/isle/ist003

Interfaith Oceans is a program of the World Stewardship Institute, a 501(c)3 organization, and the National Religious Coalition on Creation Care. 
Visit new
website!

Site design originally by Kelley Rajala,
      Web masters Julie Dunlap and Marybeth Lorbiecki.
Copyright  Interfaith Oceans.